Impact of Anthropogenic Land Alterations on Bird Diversity, Abundance and Feeding Guild in Nilgiri District

Rajesh Ramnarayan, K. Shanthi


In this study, avian data was collected using Line transect method in anthropogenically altered landscapes of Nilgiris district. A total of 108 species of birds were observed in the eight sampling locations. The total number of birds recorded stood at 14212 and the total number of observations at 8771.  The number of resident bird species stood at 95.  The species count for winter migrants and passage visitor stood at 12 and 1 respectively. Number of Endemic species observed was 8.  Under the category of well wooded area: tea estate in Kunjapanai and Catherine with diversified shade trees; and SIMS park (botanical garden) were chosen.  Under the category of tea monoculture area (under monotypic shade tree of Grevillea robusta) locations of Mullur, Dolphin Nose and Attadi tea estate were included. Residential area of Brookland (Coonoor taluk) and Commercial area of Coonoor town were chosen under the urban area category.  Avian data was analysed both under both landscape level and at patch level. The objective of this study is to ascertain the status of bird richness and abundance in these varying landscapes. The number of species recorded in landscape categories of well-wooded area, tea monoculture area and urban area stood at 103, 60 and 34 species respectively. At patch level, Kunjapani, Catherine and SIMS park had higher bird richness and abundance when compared with the three areas of tea planation under monotypic shade of Grevillea robusta. The Coonoor town area had the lowest species count but had the highest bird abundance.  Attadi tea estate (tea monoculture area) had the lowest bird abundance.  Tea gardens under the monotypic shade tree of Silver Oak support few bird species, and with low abundance. Conversion of these areas into urban areas will only serve to increase the abundance of a handful of omnivores.


Nilgiri Biosphere; Monoculture; Urbanisation; Frugivore; Insectivore; Omnivore;


Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. 1987. Compact Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan. Oxford University Press, New Delhi. 737 pages.

Anand, M.O.; Krishnaswamy, J. and Das, A. 2008. Proximity to forests drives bird conservation value of coffee plantations: implications for certification. Ecological Applications 18: 1754-1763.

Bhagwat, S.A.; Willis, K.J.; Birks, H.J.B. and Whittaker, R.J. 2008. Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 261-267.

Bibbly, Colin; Martin Jones and Stuart Marsden. 1998.expedition Field Techniques, Bird Surveys. Expedition Advisory Centre, Royal Geographic Society, London, 1998. 143 pages.

Castelletta, M; Sodhi, N.S. and Subaraj, R. 2000. Heavy extinctions of forest avifauna in Singapore: lessons for biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology 14: 1870-1880.

Census of India 2011. Tamilnadu. District Census Handbook. The Nilgiris 2011. Available online http:

Chape, S.; Harrison, J.; Spalding, M. and Lysenko, I. 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360: 443-455.

Chazdon, R.L.; Celia, A. Harvey; Oliver Komar; Daniel M. Griffith; Bruce, G. Ferguson; Miguel, Mart´ınez-Ramos; Helda, Morales; Ronald, Nigh; Lorena, Soto-Pinto; Michiel van Breugel and Stacy M. Philpott. 2009. Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Bioptropica 41(2): 142-153.

Cincotta, R.P.; Winewski, J. and Engleman, R. 2000. Human populations in Biodiversity Hotspots. Nature. 404: 990-992.

Clarke, K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117-143.

Das, Arundhati; Krishnaswamy, J.; Bawa, K.S.; M.C; Kiran, V.; Srinivas, V.; Kumar, N.S. and Karanth, K.U. 2006. Prioritisation of conservation areas in the Western Ghats. Biological Conservation 133: 16–31.

District Statistical Handbook. The Nilgiris district 2015-16. Department of Economics and Statistics, The Nilgiris. 162 pages.

Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T. and Ryan, P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontological Electronica 4(1): 9 pages.

Hoekstra, J.M.; Boucher, T.M.; Ricketts, T.H. and Roberts, C. 2005. Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters 8: 23–29.

Jha, C.S.; Dutt, C.B.S. and Bawa, K.S. 2000. Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India. Current Science 79: 231 -238.

Fowler, Jim; Cohen, Lou and Jarvis, P. 2009. Practical Statistics for Field Biology. Second edition. John Wiley, London. 259 pages.

Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper-Collins, New York. 654 pages.

Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; da Fonseca G.A.B. and Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

Raman, T.R.S. and Sukumar, R. 2002. Responses of tropical rainforest birds to abandoned plantations, edges and logged forest in the Western Ghats, India. Animal Conservation 5: 201–216.

Raman, T.R.S., 2006. Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shade plantations in Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 1577-1607

Ramesh, V. Gopalakrishna, T. and Barve., S. 2017. IUCN greatly underestimates threat levels of endemic birds in the Western Ghats. Biological Conservation 210, Part A: 205-221.

Reddy, C.S.; Dutta, K. and Jha, C.S. 2013. Analysing the gross and net deforestation rates in India. Current Science 105 (11): 1492-1500.

Ricketts, T.H. and Lonsdorf, E. 2013. Mapping the margin: comparing marginal values of tropical forest remnants for pollination services. Ecological Application 23: 1113- 1123.

Robin, V.V.; Pooja Gupta; Prachi, Thatte and Uma Ramakrishnan. 2015. Islands within islands: two montane paleo endemic birds impacted by recent anthropogenic fragmentation. Journal of Molecular Ecology 24: 3572-3584.

Rosenzweig, M.L. 2003. Reconciliation ecology and future of species diversity. Oryx 37: 194-205.

Satish, K.V.; Saranya, K.R.L.; Sudhakar Reddy C.; Hari Krishna, P.; Jha, C.S. and Prasada Rao, P.V.V. 2014. Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes (1920–2012) in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186: 8125-8140.

Sekercioglu, CH; Ehrlich. P.R.; Daily, G.C.; Aygen D; Goehring D; and Sandi R. 2002. Disappearance of Insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 263-267.

Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois. 144 pages.

Shi, Hua; Singh, Ashibindu; Kant, Shashi; Zhu, Zhiliang and Waller, E. 2005.Integrating habitat status, human population pressure, and protection status into biodiversity conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology 19(4): 1273-1285.

Terborgh, John; Carel van Schaik, C; Lisa Davenport and Madhu Rao. 1992. Making Parks Work: Strategies for preserving Tropical Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC. 511 Pages.

The Tea Research Institute of Sri Lanka, circular 2003. Available online at Advisory_Circulars/SI/TRI_SI02(e).pdf.

UPASI Tea Research Foundation. Available online at

Urban Scenario Tamilnadu based on 2001 census. Available online at

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

COPYRIGHT of this Journal vests fully with the National Instional Institute of Ecology. Any commercial use of the content on this site in any form is legally prohibited.