Plant Population Structure and Species Diversity Status at Two Disturbance Regimes Within Mixed Forests and Sal Forests of Gorakhpur, India

Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Ravindra P. Shukla

Abstract


This study of plant population structure and regeneration strategy of various woody species of mixed forests and sal forests compares the effect of disturbance on the status of species population especially with reference to ramet vs. genet. The less disturbed forests were more dominated by sprouters and ramet producing species as compared to highly disturbed ones. Analysis of variance among the number of species falling under different regeneration categories, i.e., OS (Regenerating only through seeds), FS (Facultative sprouters), OR (Obligate sprouter), RP (Ramet producers) and SR (Storage roots) showed significant differences (F 4, 3 = 5.31) at  p < 0.01.   A total of 166 species was recorded in less disturbed mixed forest and only 48 species in highly disturbed sal forest stand. At low disturbance, the trees like Mallotus philippensis, Holarrhena antidysenterica, Ficus glomerulata, Careya arborea and Pongamia pinnata  showed quite stable population structure. On the other hand, trees like Flacourtia indica, Carissa spinarum, Casearia tomentosa, Putranjiva roxburghii, Antidesma ghaesembilla and Cassia fistula, at high disturbance, were quite frequent as sprouts in mixed forests as compared to sal stands. In presence of recurrent disturbance, the common undertrees and lianas readily acquired shrubby habit. Most of the obligate sprouter and ramet producers formed several sub-populations or meta-populations (patronized by a single genet).  Population structure for tree species was stable in less disturbed forest stands having large number of individuals of lower girth classes. Except for sal, most of the tree species showed reverse J-shaped population structure. The ramet and genet density, along the age series, was positively correlated in sal forests and negatively correlated in mixed forests. Proportion of obligate sprouters was quite similar for less disturbed sal and mixed forests when the whole complex of a single genet was treated as only one individual. The diversity index (H) was always greater when a genet complex was treated as single individual than in case when each ramet, distinct at soil surface, were treated as separate individuals irrespective of the forest type and degree of disturbance. Further, this index was always greater for forest communities facing low disturbance. The similarity index values ranged between 0.46 to 0.84 for any two forest stands. The information on the impact of disturbance and heat stress of different degrees on the regeneration strategy and population structure of woody plants may be helpful for adapting conservation and diversity maintenance strategy within the regional tropical forest ecosystem.

Keywords


Regeneration Strategy; Ramet- and Genet; Population Status; Metapopulation; Disturbance; Sal and Mixed Forests.

References


Abrahamson, W.G. 1980. Demography and vegetative reproduction. Pages 89-106, In: Solbrig, O.T. (Editor) Demography and Evolution in Plant Population. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

Alexander, H.M.; Foster, B.L.; Ballantyne, IV.F.; Collins, C.D.; Antonovics, J. and Holt, R.D. 2012. Metatpopulation and metacommunities: combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology. Journal of Ecology 100: 88- 102.

Ayyappan, N. and Parthasarathy, N. 1999. Biodiversity inventory of trees in a large-scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest at Varagaliar, Annamalias, Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1533-1554.

Barker, P.C.J. and Krikpatrik, J.B. 1994. Phyllocladus asplenifolius: variability in the population structure the regeneration niche and dispersion pattern in Tasmanian forest. Australian Journal of Botany 42: 163-190.

Barik, S.K.; Pandey, H.N.; Tripathi, R.S. and Rao, P. 1992. Microenvironmental variability and species-diversity in treefall gaps in a subtropical broadleaved forest. Vegetatio 103: 31−40.

Bellingham, P.J. and Sparrow, A.D. 2000. Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos 89: 409–416.

Benitze-Malvido, J. 1998. Impact of forest fragmentation on seedling abundance in a tropical rain forest. Conservation Biology 2: 380-389.

Bond, W.J. and Midgley, J.J.2001. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 45–51.

Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India, New Delhi. 404 pages.

Cornelissen, J.H.C.; Song, Y.B.; Yu, F.H. and Dong. M. 2014. Plant traits and ecosystem effects of clonality: a new research agenda. Annals of Botany 114: 369-376.

Chandrashekara, U.M. and Ramakrishnan, P.S.1994. Vegetation and gap dynamics of a tropical wet evergreen forest in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 337–354.

Cunningham, A.B. 2001. Applied Ethnobotany: People Wild Plants Use and Conservation. Earthscan Publications, London. 300 pages.

de Kroon, H,; Hara, T. and Kwant, R. 1992. Size hierarchies of shoots and clones in clonal herb monocultures: do clonal and nonclonal plants compete differently? Oikos 63: 410–419.

Foster RB. 1980. Heterogeneity and disturbance in tropical vegetation. Pages 75-92, In: Soule, M.E. and Wilox, B.A. (Editors) Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (MS).

Gautam, M.K.; Manhas, R.K. and Tripathi, A.K. 2014. Plant species diversity in unmanaged moist deciduous forest of Northern India. Current Science 106: 277-287.

Grubb, P.J. 1977. The maintenance of species- richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Botanical Review 52: 107- 145.

Halle,´ F.; Oldeman, R.A.A. and Tomlinson, P.B.1978. Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis. Springer, Berlin. 444 pages.

Hubbell, S.P. and Foster, R.B. 1983. Diversity of canopy trees in a neotropical forest and implication for conservation. Pages 25-41, In: Sutton, S.L.; Whitmore, T.C. and Chadwick, A.C. (Editors). The Tropical Rain Forest: Ecology and Management. Blackwells, Oxford.

Keely, J.E.; Pausas, J.G.; Rundel, P.W.; Bond, W.J. and Bradstock, R.A. 2001. Fire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits. Trends in Plant Sciences 16: 406-411.

Kushwaha, S.P.S. and Nandi, S. 2012. Species diversity and community structure in sal (Shorea robusta) forests of two different rainfall regimes in West Bengal, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 21:1215-1228.

Majumdar, K.; Uma Shankar and Datta, B.K. 2012. Tree species diversity and stand structure along major community types in lowland primary and secondary moist deciduous forests in Tripura, Northeast India. Journal of Forestry Research 23: 553-568

Mallik, A.V. and Gimingham, C.M. 1983. Regeneration of heathland plants following burning. Vegetatio 53: 45-58.

Manikant, C.L. 1994. Working Plan of Sohagi Barwa Wildlife Sanctaury (South Gorakhpur Division) for the Years 1994-95 to 2003-2004. Department of Forest, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, India. 119 pages.

Moravie, M.A. Pascal, J.P. and Auger, P. 1997. Investigating canopy regeneration process through individual based models: application to a tropical rain forest. Ecological Modeling 104: 241- 260.

Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley, New York. 547 pages.

Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. 574 pages.

Pandey, S.K. 2000. Population Status and Regeneration Strategy of Some Perennial Legumes in Plantation Forests of North-Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Ph.D. Thesis, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India.

Pandey, S.K. and Shukla, R.P.1999. Plant diversity and community patterns along the disturbance gradient in plantation forests of sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn). Current Science 77:814–818

Pandey, S.K. and Shukla, R.P. 2001. Regeneration strategy and plant diversity status in degraded sal forests. Current Science 81: 95-102.

Pandey, S.K. and Shukla, R.P. 2003. Plant diversity in managed sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f) forest of Gorakhpur, India: species composition, regeneration and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:2295-2319.

Pandey, S.K. and Shukla, R.P. 2005. Plant community and diversity patterns within the forested landscape of north-western U.P. Indian Forester 131:1217–1226.

Panigrahi, G.; Singh, A.N. and Mishra, O.P. 1969. Contribution to the botany of the terai forest of the Bahraich District of Uttar Pradesh. Bulletin of the Botanical Survery of India 11(1 and 2): 89–114.

Phillips, O.L. and Gentry, A.H. 1994. Increasing turn over through time in tropical forests. Science 263: 954- 957.

Rabotnov, T.A.1969. On coenopopulations of perennial herbaceous plants in natural coenoses. Vegetatio 19: 87-95.

Rao, P.; Barik, S.K.; Pandey, H.N. and Tripathi, R.S. 1997. Tree seed germination and seedling establishment in tree fall gaps and understorey in a subtropical forest of northeast India. Australian Journal of Ecology 22: 136–145.

Rocabado, G.C.; Claros, M.P.; Bongers, F.; Alarcon, A.; Liconam, J.C. and Poorter, L. 2012. Effects of disturbance intensity on species and functional diversity in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology 100 (6): 1453- 1463.

Saha, S. and Howe, H.F. 2003. Species composition and fire in a dry deciduous forest. Ecology 84: 3118-3123.

Shah, S.A. 1994. Ecological aspects of tropical forest management (The case of India). Indian Forester 120: 981-999.

Shibata, R.; Shibata, M.; Tanaka, H.; Iida, S.; Masaki, T.; Hatta, F.; Kurokawa, H. and Nakashizuka, T. 2014. Interspecific varia-tion in the size-dependent resprouting ability of temperate woody species and its adaptive significance. Journal of Ecology 102: 209-220.

Shukla, R.P. and Ramakrishnan, P.S.1986. Architecture and growth strategies of tropical trees in relation to successional status. Journal of Ecology 74: 33-46.

Tilman, D.; Isbell, F. and Cowles, J.M. 2014. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 45: 471-493.

Tripathi, A.K. and UmaShankar. 2014. Pattern of species dominance, diversity and dispersion in “Khasi Hill Sal” forest ecosystem in northeast India. Forest Ecosystem 1:23. DOI 10.1186/ s40663-014-0023-2

Uma Shankar. 2001. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science 81: 776-786.

Vest, P.A. and Westoby, M. 2004. Sprouting ability across diverse disturbances and vegetation types Wordwide. Journal of Ecology 90: 310-320.

Walker, B.H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6: 18-23.

Whitemore, T.C. 1993. An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forest. Oxford University Press, Oxford. .226 pages.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

COPYRIGHT of this Journal vests fully with the National Instional Institute of Ecology. Any commercial use of the content on this site in any form is legally prohibited.